STIHL FS94R String Trimmer Durability Test! (Will It Run On Mountain Dew?)
|
|
Time to read 7 min
|
|
Time to read 7 min
Table of contents
A trimmer can feel great in your hands and still leave you wondering if it’s too light to last. That’s the whole tension with the STIHL FS 94 R. It’s STIHL’s lightest-weight commercial trimmer, and at Main Street Mower, Chip and Stu say it’s become one of their best sellers.
The weird part is how it feels at first. They describe it as almost toy-like, so light that your brain says, “This thing’s going to break.” In their shop, though, they’ve seen the engines hold up for years with normal use. So they decide to skip “normal” and simulate years of abuse in one day, drops, heat, rough handling, and even a wild fuel experiment.
STIHL doesn’t recommend any of this, and Main Street Mower doesn’t either.
Chip and Stu’s goal is simple: find out if the FS 94 R is tough enough for real work, even when it’s treated badly. They want viewers to be able to make a smart buying decision, not just based on specs, but based on what breaks first when things go wrong.
They don’t baby it. They “dog” it, by dropping it, running it hot, and trying things no owner should do. The FS 94 R keeps coming back, with a couple important failures along the way.
Early in the test, they focus on the clutch feel. The trimmer is running, and they’re able to control speed with their hand in a way that makes them think the clutch is slipping instead of stalling.
Here’s what they notice right away:
It’s not presented as a failure. It’s more like a stress warmup that shows how quickly heat can build in that part of the drivetrain when the tool is forced to slip.
After the clutch talk, they jump to a real-world weak spot: rewind starters.
In the shop, they see rewind failures from people who don’t start equipment gently. An owner might pull the cord smoothly every time. An employee might not. So they recreate that abuse with aggressive pulls, the kind that make a recoil system hate its life.
They even put a name to that type of operator.
They use “hammerhead” as an inside-shop term for someone who treats equipment like it’s indestructible. If something doesn’t work, they don’t troubleshoot it, they yank it, slam it, or force it. As Stu describes it, everything looks like a nail, and it needs hammering.
That mindset is what this whole test is built around.
Then the FS 94 R starts taking hits, including a rough drop that lands right on the spark plug area. It was running, then it dies. They stop and diagnose it on the spot.
They suspect the spark plug cracked, and they find evidence that matches that idea. They mention seeing arcing, which lines up with damage around the plug connection area.
The sequence goes like this:
This is an important detail for anyone buying the FS 94 R. The engine itself isn’t what gives up first. A more exposed, more fragile component fails, and it fails from impact.
Chip and Stu call out the reason in plain terms: the cover is light duty, and the plug takes the punishment.
This is where they push the trimmer into the danger zone. They cover the motor area with a pillowcase, joking about “Delta Force style” and “bag them and drag them.” The idea is to restrict airflow and see what heat does to performance.
Almost immediately, it stops revving the way it should. They suspect the exhaust is being restricted, and they even talk about poking a small hole to help it breathe.
Then the real warning sign hits: the handle gets extremely hot. Not warm, not uncomfortable. They describe it as massively hot.
Don’t bag a trimmer and run it. They say it clearly, because the test shows why.
Under that heat, they run into another issue. The plug breaks again, and the machine shows signs consistent with fuel delivery problems caused by heat. They describe it as pressurized heat and call it vapor lock, then they let it cool.
After a short cool-down (they mention about 5 minutes), the trimmer returns to normal operation. It’s back to running good.
They also float a smart theory during this section:
Gasoline has a boiling point, and ignition components like a coil can fail when heat pushes them over the edge.
They don’t claim the coil failed. They’re thinking out loud about what heat can do, especially because heat-related ignition issues often show up only when components are stressed.
After the heat test, they remove the guard before moving on. Again, they repeat that STIHL doesn’t recommend it, and neither do they. But they test it anyway, because people do it in the real world.
They cut thicker stuff and talk about how it performs. The basic takeaway is simple: it works, and it works well, even if the setup is less safe and less comfortable.
They also mention putting the limiter back on and keeping it “under 60.” It’s said like an inside reference, but the point is clear: they adjust the setup back toward normal after pushing it.
This is the moment most viewers came for. They decide to see if the FS 94 R will run with Mountain Dew mixed into the fuel.
They joke about mechanics loving Mountain Dew, and they even say you can smell it through the exhaust. Then they do it: they add about 5 to 6 ounces of Mountain Dew into the gas.
And the trimmer runs. Not barely runs, it runs “perfect,” and they say it was running to spec.
They pour some of the mixture into a glass jar to see what it looks like, and it separates:
They also joke about the smell, calling two-stroke plus Mountain Dew one of the manliest smells on the planet, and they nickname the experiment “dostroke” (or “Dewstroke,” as the video title puts it).
At one point, they riff on a pretend recipe, but it’s clearly humor, not a real mix recommendation. The real, useful detail is the measurable part: 5 to 6 ounces of soda went in, and the engine still ran well during the test.
Chip asks others in the shop to be mean to it, to do something that feels rough and unfair. The funny part is that the crew has good technique and ends up using it more normally than expected. Even then, the point stands.
A tool that survives this kind of day, handled by multiple people, in multiple abusive scenarios, is showing something real about its build.
By the end, they’re ready to call it. They even suggest it deserves an honorary place on the wall because they didn’t expect it to take this much punishment.
They compare their expectations to another model, the FS 91, saying they assumed the FS 94 R wouldn’t hold up the same way. In their minds, it’s lighter, so it must be less tough. The day changes that.
A couple things did fail, and they’re clear about what those were:
Those are real negatives, but they also come with context: both failures were tied to extreme misuse, not normal trimming.
This is the list that makes the video worth watching:
Chip sums it up in plain language: it’s a beast, a workhorse, and it’s both lightweight and heavy duty.
If you’re considering this model, you can find it on their site: STIHL FS 94 R gas-powered string trimmer on MainStreetMower.com.
The STIHL FS 94 R walks into this test with a “too light to be tough” reputation, and walks out with a different story. Two spark plug failures and a heat-caused vapor lock are the only clear breaks, and both happen during extreme misuse. Past that, it keeps restarting, keeps cutting, and even keeps running after the Dewstroke experiment and water in the intake. If you’re shopping for a lightweight commercial trimmer, this test makes a strong case that light doesn’t have to mean fragile.
Links to Main Street Mower